Friday 29 April 2016

Rewilding - a review of Feral

 I have just finished George Monbiot’s excellent Feral, but have had a tint of sadness since. My perceptions and sentiments towards the British countryside have been altered, what I believed to be sublime is now just a brutal manmade landscape.

There is clearly still beauty in the rural environment, but this is subjective. Is this beautiful landscape defined by the idyllic visions of 19th Century pastoral existence, or is it the beauty that was unrestrained several thousands year ago when a totally different scale of flora and fauna existed.

Monbiot unleashes some devastating stats on how this environment has been decimated by humans. Arguably what is left does not resemble closely the original terrain. Britain has the lowest forest … 

The deck is stacked against the rewilding project. Land is distributed to a small landowning class who are resistance to wild animals. The farming lobby is influential within government. The British public have a fixed vision of what the British countryside should be. We also have a hysterical media who exaggerate any issues around “wild cats” such as the “Beast of Bodmin”.

But humans have an innate condition that connects them or makes them long for the wild. The wild cat stories are symptomatic of this.  There is an excellent early chapter on the numerous tabloid stories of sightings of supposed large cats like panthers and leopards. There is absolutely no evidence that these exist in the British Isles but our desire to re-connect makes many residents believe in the possibility.

The main body of Feral though is about the merits of rewilding. The loss of original flora and fauna is quite staggering from when humans first crossed the English Channel. We now hold a fraction of this abundance. The proposal is to reintroduce wolves, lynx, beaver and lesser known species of bird and small mammals. The benefits in terms of the food chain, educational and wildlife tourism are great, arguably outweighing the risks to livestock and farmers livelihoods.

Particular criticism of current conservation policy goes to the Cambrian Mountains and British sheep farmers. The desolate landscapes that are revered as finest British upland have a false appeal according to Monbiot. The landscape has been chewed down into a monoculture of scrub and short grass. Wildlife that could flourish has felt a knock on effect from this pared down flora.

I had a look at the Sussex Wildlife Trust website after reading this to see what the practice was. Wildlife Trusts have their own grazing policy that encourages this. Have we become accustomed to the benign view of sheep grazing to see this as typical British landscape? There is a lack of imagination perhaps on what the countryside could be. The Woodland Trust see sheep and trees as being harmonious and having benefits.